March 7, 2025

Cloud Data Warehouse vs. Data Lake: Which One Should You Choose?

March 7, 2025

Cloud Data Warehouse vs. Data Lake: Which One Should You Choose?

No items found.

Listen to this article

Powered by NotebookLM
Listen to this article

Struggling to decide between a cloud data warehouse vs data lake? The rapid growth in data presents a major challenge for organizations. While the cloud offers theoretically unparalleled storage capabilities, IT leaders are grappling with very real budget constraints, and 81% of IT leaders report being asked to cap or reduce cloud budgets.

In this context, it’s crucial to understand how choosing the wrong architecture for your data can result in unnecessarily increased expenses, reduced performance, and limited flexibility. 

There are two predominant options available to try to achieve this balance: the cloud data warehouse (CDW) and the cloud data lake. CDWs provide a central repository optimized for analysis, while data lakes are flexible "dumping grounds" for raw data in its native format. Each model carries distinct trade-offs in areas like ingestion, governance, performance, and cost efficiency.

Read on as we compare cloud data warehouse vs data lake by considering their essential attributes, and equip yourself with the insights to make informed decisions about balancing workloads, costs, and performance.

The Evolution of Data Storage Architecture

Driven by the increasing volume, variety, and speed of data, the methods used to store and manage it have evolved significantly over time. We’ll lay out a brief overview of this journey below, before drilling down into the details in the rest of the article. 

Databases and Data Warehouses

Early databases and traditional data warehouses, built for structured data and batch processing, quickly fell short as datasets grew exponentially. These systems struggled with scalability, concurrency, and latency for big data analytics. 

Data Warehouse vs. Data Lake: Evolution

To address an influx of unstructured and semi-structured data and the need to account for future analysis that might not be formally defined today, data lakes emerged, enabling long-term raw storage of data in its native format whether that be text, multimedia, or logs.

The advent of cloud computing further transformed data lakes and warehouses by introducing elasticity and scalable processing power. For example, innovations like columnar storage, advanced indexing, and hyper-scaling have significantly improved the cost-efficiency and performance of cloud-based analytics, and serverless query engines now support on-demand analysis directly from data lakes, reducing operational complexity and costs. 

Data Lake to Lakehouses

The introduction of lakehouses marked another leap forward. These are systems which combine the raw data storage capabilities of data lakes with the high-performance analytics of warehouses, enabling you to address diverse workloads efficiently. This unified approach provides the adaptability and performance required for today's demanding data needs.

Evolution of Data Storage Architecture
Databases → Warehouses → Data Lakes → Lakehouses

Now that we’ve taken a look at the big picture, let’s get into the specifics.

Cloud Data Warehouse: Definition and Key Features

What Is a Cloud Data Warehouse?

Originally, a cloud data warehouse was a structured data repository optimized for analytical workloads. This type of relational database lives in the cloud and can combine large amounts of data from numerous sources, such as ERP systems, transaction platforms, and other applications. While traditionally focused on structured data, modern cloud data warehouses, such as Firebolt, now also support semi-structured data (e.g., JSON, Parquet, ORC). However, compared to data lakes, they are still not the optimal choice for fully unstructured data such as videos or images.

Cloud Data Warehouse Hybrid Use Cases:

Some modern cloud data warehouses extend their capabilities to operational workloads (e.g., real-time analytics), blurring the lines between analytical and transactional systems.

Relational Database:

Most cloud data warehouses are relational databases, but they implement distributed, columnar storage architectures optimized for analytics, unlike traditional row-oriented transactional databases.

Core Features of Cloud Data Warehouse

CDWs have the following characteristics:

  • Schema-On-Write: The system requires you to define and enforce data structure before ingestion. Data must match predefined schemas during the loading process.
  • ACID Compliance: The database ensures transactions either succeed or fail, avoiding partial updates (Atomicity), follow all standardized rules to ensure the data is meaningful (Consistency), successfully conclude independently of concurrent transactions (Isolation), and persist permanently to prevent data corruption caused by external events such as a power loss (Durability).
  • Optimized for SQL Queries: CDWs employ fast SQL query execution with millisecond latency and the ability to handle hundreds of analytical queries per second. This is possible through specialized indexing, partitioning, and caching mechanisms.
  • Structured Data Focus: These systems work best with data organized in predefined rows and columns, much like spreadsheets.

Cloud Data Warehouse Architecture

A typical CDW operates on a three-tier architecture:

  • Bottom Tier: Consists of warehouse servers and clusters running in the cloud that manage storage and computing resources. This foundation handles the raw data processing power.
  • Middle Tier: Contains the Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) engine, which handles query parsing and optimization and manages data flow between storage and the User Interface (UI).
  • Top Tier: This layer comprises the user interface where customers interact with data through Business Intelligence tools such as Tableau or Power BI, and dashboards. This tier translates their requests into SQL queries and displays the results.

Popular Cloud Data Warehouse Platforms

Some common CDW implementations include:

  • Snowflake: A multi-cluster architecture that offers automatic scaling and data sharing across different cloud providers.
  • Amazon Redshift: An AWS warehouse solution that integrates natively with S3 and provides ML-powered query optimization and automated workload management.
  • Google BigQuery: A serverless data warehouse that automatically scales resources and enables instant analytics with built-in ML capabilities. 

What Is a Data Lake?

A data lake is a repository for storing raw data in its native format until it is needed for analysis. Information in this database is preserved in as much detail as possible, on-premises or in the cloud. 

Data lakes are characterized by:

  • Schema-On-Read Flexibility: There's no need to predefine the data structure (schema) before storage. Instead, the schema is applied later during querying, allowing greater adaptability for diverse use cases.
  • Support for All Data Types: This repository effectively handles structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, allowing it to process diverse inputs like relational database records, sensor readings, emails, weblogs, documents, images, and more.
  • Scalable Storage: With the ability to scale storage and processing capacity, data lakes are well-suited for managing exponential data growth.
  • Cost-Efficient: Storage is independent of computing, enabling low-cost hardware to economically store large volumes of data.

Data lakes rely on these core components:

  • Storage Layer: Serves as the foundation for collecting raw data from various structured and unstructured sources. This layer ensures that the data is preserved in its original form for future use.
  • Processing Engines: Execute queries and transformations on data stored in the storage layer, enabling operations like filtering, aggregation, and analysis.
  • Metadata Management: Organizes and tracks key details about the data, such as sources, schemas, access patterns, and lineage. This layer helps users understand and navigate the data efficiently.
  • Security Controls: Ensure proper access policies for data security while enabling granular control over data lake usage across roles.

Popular data lake platforms include:

  • Amazon S3: An object storage service that forms the foundation for AWS data lakes, offering virtually unlimited scalability and integration with AWS analytics services.
  • Azure Data Lake Storage: Microsoft's hierarchical storage system combines file system capabilities with blob storage scalability.
  • Google Cloud Storage: A multi-class storage service that automatically optimizes data placement based on access patterns and lifecycle policies.
  • Delta Lake on Databricks: An open-source storage layer that brings ACID transactions and versioning to data lakes while maintaining compatibility with Apache Spark.

Pros & Cons of Data Lakes

Pros of Data Lakes:
  • Cost-effective storage of large data volumes with no preprocessing required
  • Flexibility to store any type of data in its native format
  • Support for diverse analytics use cases from a single source
  • Ability to capture all data without having to define its purpose upfront
  • Scalability to handle growing data volumes and new data types
  • Ideal for machine learning and advanced analytics that require raw data
  • Enable data scientists to access unfiltered data for discovery
  • Allow for real-time analytics on streaming data
  • Preservation of full data fidelity for future use cases
  • Lower storage costs compared to traditional data warehouses
Cons of Data Lakes:
  • Can become "data swamps" without proper governance and metadata management
  • Require specialized skills to effectively query and analyze raw data
  • Quality and consistency issues if data ingestion isn't properly monitored
  • Security and privacy concerns due to storing sensitive data in raw form
  • Performance can be slower compared to purpose-built databases
  • More complex to maintain and manage compared to traditional databases
  • Risk of data becoming unusable or irretrievable without proper documentation
  • Potential compliance challenges with regulations like GDPR
  • Higher skill barrier for business users compared to data warehouses
  • Can lead to redundant storage of similar data without proper oversight

Data Lakehouse Platforms 

A data lakehouse is a modern hybrid architecture that combines the best elements of data lakes and data warehouses. Lakehouse platforms aim to provide the flexibility and cost-efficiency of data lakes with the data management and ACID transaction support traditionally associated with data warehouses.

Key characteristics of data lakehouse platforms include:

  • Unified Architecture: Enables both traditional SQL analytics and machine learning workloads on the same data platform
  • ACID Transactions: Ensures data consistency and reliability through atomic, consistent, isolated, and durable operations
  • Schema Enforcement: Allows optional schema validation while maintaining data lake flexibility
  • Direct BI Support: Enables business intelligence tools to directly query the lakehouse without data copying
  • Governance Features: Provides advanced data versioning, auditing, and access controls

Leading data lakehouse platforms include Databricks Lakehouse Platform, Snowflake, AWS Lake Formation, and Azure Synapse Analytics.

Cloud Data Warehouse Vs Data Lake: Detailed Comparison of Key Differences

Data warehouses and data lakes are both vital for supporting analytical use cases, but their architectural differences give rise to each having its particular strengths and limitations. This detailed comparison will help you determine the best fit for your organization's needs:

Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake
Aspect Cloud Data Warehouse Data Lake
Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake: Data Structure and Processing A cloud data warehouse ingests structured and semi-structured data with a predefined schema. It employs traditional ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipelines. Data is cleaned, validated, and optimized during the "transform" phase before loading into the warehouse. A data lake accommodates structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data with a flexible schema. Data is stored in raw format using ELT (Extract, Load, Transform), and transformations occur when you need the information.
Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake: Performance and Query Capabilities Optimizes for fast analytics against structured data, with consistent instant response times. Cloud data warehouse performance is reliable regardless of concurrent customers or query complexity. However, semi-structured data performance may require additional optimization steps to achieve similar results. Performance varies depending on the data lake architecture and workload configurations. While capable of handling large datasets and complex queries, maintaining low latency requires careful tuning and resource allocation.
Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake: Scalability Operates on a pay-as-you-go model with flexible infrastructure that dynamically adjusts resources based on demand. This approach ensures predictable costs and optimized cloud data warehouse performance through caching, indexing, and storage formatting. However, query performance may decline under extreme workloads. Offers unlimited storage for any volume of raw data. With storage and compute managed independently, a data lake allows efficient growth and flexible scaling to meet your specific requirements.
Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake: Cost Structure and Resource Requirements A cloud data warehouse employs specialized storage formats like columnar databases optimized for fast analytical performance. This approach reduces query times but increases per-terabyte storage costs compared to standard object stores. Advanced compression techniques help minimize the overall data footprint, partially offsetting the higher storage expenses. For compute prices, you can provision processing power based on expected workloads, enabling predictable pricing. Built-in query optimization, caching, and resource management further boost efficiency. Stores raw data in scalable, low-cost object storage without proprietary formatting. Data lake compute resources are applied on a pay-per-use approach, charging you on actual usage. This enables flexibility, but potentially increases costs for complex or resource-intensive queries. Expect an additional computational overhead if you have multi-structured data and diverse workloads.
Cloud Data Warehouse Vs. Data Lake: Operational Costs Requires higher upfront investment to set up predefined schemas and ETL pipelines. Maintaining cloud data warehouse operations often involves hiring skilled personnel, such as database administrators and BI developers, contributing to higher administrative overhead. A data lake needs lower initial investments but needs a greater focus on ongoing data preparation. Raw data storage requires good governance with well-maintained catalogs, schemas, and pipelines. Expertise in data engineering, cataloging, and platform administration is essential for effective management. While ad-hoc analysis is possible, deep transformations can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Cloud Data Warehouse vs. Data Lake: Key Differences

Data Warehouse:

  • Structured data with predefined schema
  • ETL approach (transform before loading)
  • Optimized for structured data analysis
  • Higher storage costs, predictable compute costs
  • Ideal for BI and operational reporting

Data Lake:

  • Raw data storage with flexible schema
  • ELT approach (transform when needed)
  • Handles all data types (structured, semi-structured, unstructured)
  • Lower storage costs, variable compute costs 
  • Ideal for data science and exploratory analysis

Cloud Data Warehouse Vs Data Lake: Use Cases and User Profiles

Cloud data warehouses and data lakes cater to different analytical requirements, making each more suitable for specific scenarios and user groups. By understanding these key differences, organizations can choose the right solution to meet their goals. Here's a closer look at how each technology is applied:

Data Warehouse Scenarios

  • Business Intelligence: These databases are well-suited for BI workflows, including:
    • Regular Reporting: Automating reports that rely on fixed schemas and predefined data models.
    • Dashboard Creation: Building and maintaining interactive dashboards for instant insights.
    • KPI Monitoring: Tracking standardized metrics for your business performance over time.
  • Data Analysis: These systems are ideal for on-demand analysis through capabilities such as:
    • Ad-hoc Queries: Allowing users to perform quick, exploratory analysis on curated datasets.
    • Performance Analytics: Delivering insights embedded within applications or workflows for operational decision-making.
    • Business Metrics: Identifying patterns and trends to guide strategic decisions.
  • User Profiles: The following roles commonly use CDWs for their daily tasks:
    • Business Analysts: Generating governance reports and monitoring performance indicators.
    • Data Engineers: Designing and managing consumption-ready schemas for analytics.
    • Data Analysts: Running queries on structured datasets to extract actionable insights.
    • BI Developers: Building and managing dashboards, reports, and other BI tools.
    • Business Users: Accessing data through self-service platforms to inform decisions.

Data Lake Scenarios

  • Advanced Analytics: Data lakes are foundational for advanced analytic techniques like:
    • Machine Learning: Building ML models by accessing raw, granular data at scale.
    • Artificial Intelligence: Powering AI apps and services with expansive, multi-structured data.
    • Deep Learning: Training deep neural networks on vast datasets of unstructured data.
  • Data Science: These platforms are well-suited for data science tasks, including:
    • Exploratory Analysis: Enabling data scientists to investigate data without predefined constraints.
    • Model Training: Using raw, complete data to build accurate analytic models.
    • Research Projects: Supporting experimental work that requires flexible data access and loose schemas.
  • User Profiles: Common roles that depend on data lakes include:
    • Data Scientists: Accessing heterogeneous data for ad hoc analysis and modeling.
    • Data Engineers: Handling ingestion and transformation of unstructured and streaming data sources.
    • ML Engineers: Constructing training datasets for machine learning initiatives.
    • Research Teams: Running exploratory analytics to uncover insights.

Cloud Data Warehouse Vs Data Lake: Making the Right Choice

Selecting between a cloud data warehouse vs data lake is a decision that will shape your organization's analytics capabilities for years to come. The right choice depends on factors like data types, analysis goals, performance expectations, and budget. 

Key Questions To Consider

  • What type and volume of data will your organization handle regularly?
  • Will the primary focus be on dashboards and reporting or exploratory data analysis?
  • Do analysts have SQL skills, or will they need support with notebooks and big data tools?
  • How quickly does your organization require insights from newly ingested data?
  • Can decision-makers accept occasional slowdowns in query performance as data volumes grow?

Use the framework below to guide your evaluation and align the solution with your organization's needs.

Decision Framework

What’s the best choice for handling structured vs. unstructured data?

  • Use a CDW if your data is structured and organized into tables and schemas.
  • Choose a data lake for raw, unstructured data that requires flexible storage at scale.

Which option is better for fast SQL analytics and dashboards?

  • A CDW delivers high-performance SQL queries with quick response times for dashboards and BI reports.
  • A data lake is better suited for exploratory analysis, ad-hoc queries, and big data tools like Spark or Python notebooks.

Does a skillset affect decision-making?

  • If your team relies on SQL and BI tools, a CDW is the better fit.
  • If they work with Python, Spark, or R, a data lake provides more flexibility.

Which is more cost-effective?

  • A data lake offers lower-cost storage but may require extra spending on governance, security, and query optimization.
  • A CDW has higher upfront costs but simplifies infrastructure management.

What’s the best option for performance?

  • Choose a CDW for fast, consistent query speeds across large datasets.
  • A data lake is better for batch processing and workloads that can tolerate slower, more complex query optimization.

Which scales better?

  • A data lake dynamically scales storage and compute for changing workloads.
  • A CDW provides predictable scaling with minimal reconfiguration.

Cloud Data Warehouse Data Lake
Fast SQL analytics and dashboards Storage for raw, unstructured data
Structured data with defined schemas Support for Python, Spark, and R
Simplified infrastructure management Cost-effective storage for massive datasets
Consistent query performance Scalable compute for variable workloads
Predictable scaling with minimal reconfiguration Best for batch processing and exploratory analysis

How Firebolt Can Help You

Managing modern data workloads means balancing speed, scale, and cost. Cloud data warehouses handle structured analytics. Data lakes store raw, multi-structured data. Businesses need both. The right platform combines them and makes AI easier.

A cloud data warehouse for the AI era should work with any storage. Businesses should not have to move data just to run AI models. It should handle structured and unstructured data in one place. AI-driven analytics should be fast and simple.

Modern data teams need speed, scale, and cost control. Traditional cloud data warehouses handle structured data but struggle with unstructured formats, unpredictable workloads, and rising costs. Data lakes store raw data efficiently but require complex processing for analytics. A hybrid model brings both together, solving key challenges without trade-offs.

Architecture That Adapts to Any Workload

Rigid architectures create bottlenecks. A hybrid model separates storage and compute, allowing each to scale independently. Firebolt enables this with a decoupled architecture that optimizes performance while keeping costs low.

Performance Without the Price Tag

Slow queries disrupt analytics. Scaling compute to fix this often leads to wasted resources. A hybrid model ensures fast performance without overspending by decoupling storage and compute. Firebolt enables this with low-latency query execution at the best price-for-performance.

Handling High Concurrency Without Degradation

Most data warehouses slow down under heavy query loads. A hybrid approach supports high concurrency by isolating workloads. Firebolt scales beyond 4200 queries per second (QPS) while keeping response times fast.

Faster ELT and More Efficient DML

Data teams spend too much time on extraction, loading, and transformation (ELT). A hybrid model speeds up ingestion and processing by optimizing data placement. Firebolt supports efficient ELT and fast DML to keep pipelines running smoothly.

Scaling Without Wasted Costs

Scaling in traditional systems is often rigid and expensive. Hybrid models introduce multidimensional elasticity, letting teams scale compute, storage, and concurrency separately. Firebolt enables granular cost controls, so teams only pay for what they use.

Learn more about how Firebolt's capabilities can better your company's data strategy by starting a free trial today.

Read all the posts

Intrigued? Want to read some more?