Listen to this article
Picking a cloud data warehouse in 2025 means choosing a platform that can process large datasets, run complex queries, and support high user concurrency without delay. These requirements now apply to both internal analytics and external-facing applications.
Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, and Synapse lead in adoption and market reach. Databricks dominates in machine learning workflows. Oracle maintains a hold in compliance-heavy enterprise stacks. Firebolt is gaining traction with teams focused on sub-second analytics and tight resource control.
Read on to compare each platform by adoption, revenue, and performance so technical teams can see how the top providers stack up.
Cloud Data Warehouse Market Overview (2025)
The cloud data warehouse market is growing fast as more organizations shift from on-prem systems to cloud-native platforms. Engineering teams need infrastructure that can scale with sudden data growth and still deliver fast queries even when data volume or user load increases.
This shift is also the precursor for the widespread adoption of multi-cloud strategies. Companies are distributing workloads across multiple platforms instead of relying on a single vendor to improve performance, manage costs, and avoid lock-in.
The global cloud data warehouse market is projected to grow from $36.31 billion in 2025 to $155.66 billion by 2034, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.55%. This growth reflects several trends: more data from more sources, increased demand for low-latency analytics, and workloads that cover both customer-facing queries and internal reporting.
3. Microsoft Azure: Synapse
Azure Synapse Analytics is deeply integrated with Microsoft’s cloud ecosystem, making it a strong choice for organizations already using Azure services.
In Q3 2024, Microsoft Azure held 20% of the global cloud infrastructure market. Synapse benefits directly from this position, especially among enterprise teams that use Microsoft tools for storage, compute, and productivity.
Projections estimate that Synapse will hold between 10% and 15% of the cloud data warehouse market in 2025. Growth is driven by adoption from large organizations and by Synapse’s ability to support AI and machine learning workloads natively within the Azure environment.
4. Google Cloud Platform: BigQuery
BigQuery is known for handling large-scale analytics with minimal infrastructure tuning. It offers serverless architecture, built-in performance tuning, and pricing that aligns well with variable workloads.
As of Q3 2024, Google Cloud Platform held 11% of the global cloud infrastructure market. BigQuery plays a central role in that footprint, especially in data-heavy environments.
Its growth has been especially strong in the Asia Pacific region, where cloud adoption is accelerating. BigQuery’s ability to deliver fast query performance at scale has made it a preferred option for analytics teams in those markets.
5. IBM, Oracle, and Others
IBM’s Db2 Warehouse on Cloud and Oracle’s Autonomous Data Warehouse continue to serve specific enterprise needs, particularly in regulated and legacy-heavy environments. However, their overall share of the cloud data warehouse market remains small compared to the leading platforms.
Other vendors, including SAP and Teradata, also retain a presence in niche enterprise use cases. Databricks stands out among this group due to the growing adoption of its lakehouse model, which combines data warehouse and data lake capabilities in a single platform.
- Snowflake: $3.8B revenue run rate, 27% YoY growth (Wing VC).
- Databricks: $2.6B in 2024, growing at 57% YoY (Wing VC).
- AWS Redshift, BigQuery, and Azure Synapse: Revenue figures are not broken out separately but contribute significantly to their parent cloud platforms.
Cost Effectiveness
Evaluating cost-effectiveness in cloud data warehouses comes down to three key factors:
- Pricing Model and Flexibility
Platforms vary in how they charge for compute, storage, and features. Pay-as-you-go, reserved instances, or usage-based models can help optimize cost based on workload patterns. - Compute and Storage Efficiency
Platforms that separate compute and storage allow teams to scale each independently. This helps avoid overprovisioning and reduces idle costs. - Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
TCO includes more than just usage fees. It reflects operational effort, licensing, and performance per dollar over time.
Here’s how the major platforms compare:
Snowflake – Medium
Charges are separate for compute, storage, and features like data sharing. Auto-scaling helps manage load, but usage can spike costs quickly without careful monitoring.
BigQuery – Medium
Serverless and priced per query. Teams don’t manage infrastructure, which lowers operational costs. However, frequent or large queries can increase spending.
Redshift – High
Offers on-demand and reserved pricing. RA3 instances separate compute from storage, and Redshift Spectrum allows direct querying from S3, giving more control over cost and scale.
Azure Synapse – Medium
Supports both fixed-capacity and pay-per-query models. Power BI integration helps with usability, though costs may rise in large-scale enterprise deployments.
Databricks – Medium
Provides good value for analytics workloads. Its architecture allows efficient use of compute and storage. Machine learning workloads, however, often require expensive compute configurations.
Oracle – Low
High licensing fees and lock-in with the Oracle Cloud ecosystem make it a more expensive option. It remains less cost-effective for most use cases outside of Oracle-heavy environments.
Firebolt – High
Built for high performance with low overhead. Columnar storage and compute isolation help minimize resource waste. Designed to handle high concurrency while keeping query latency low, making it a strong cost-to-performance option.
Conclusion
The cloud data warehouse market continues to expand as businesses scale their data needs. Snowflake remains the most widely adopted platform, while Databricks shows the fastest growth. Multi-cloud strategies and AI-driven analytics are influencing how teams build and scale data infrastructure.
With more options available, companies need to evaluate their workloads, user demands, and cost constraints to choose the right platform.
AWS, Snowflake, BigQuery, and Azure Synapse lead in adoption. But as performance and pricing pressure grows, more teams are seeking platforms that offer better speed and control without added complexity.
Firebolt addresses these needs directly. It was built for teams that require fast, efficient analytics without the overhead of traditional cloud data warehouses.
- Sub-second queries: Fast indexing and execution keep latency low.
- High concurrency: Supports thousands of queries at once without slowdown.
- Efficient compute: Columnar storage and smart resource allocation reduce cost.
- Workload isolation: Separate compute for each workload prevents resource conflicts.
- Postgres-compatible SQL: Familiar syntax makes migration straightforward.
- Multi-cloud deployment: Avoid lock-in and deploy where it fits your stack.
Firebolt provides a lean, high-performance alternative to traditional cloud data warehouses. Book a demo today
%20logo.png){kind=icon}
